Just from the number of times I'd seen
Leslie Newbigin's book "
Foolishness to the Greeks" quoted and referenced over the last 2 or 3 years, I knew that I was going to be in for something heavy. The other day, after putting the book down for a few minutes of silent contemplation, I told my wife that it was the thickest 150 page book I've ever read. I don't know that I've ever been so deeply challenged to wrestle with the overarching philosophical paradigms that our society is built on.
It's no surprise that the questions Newbigin addresses came from his own experience as British missionary in India. The question in particular
(which invariably leads to others) that any thoughtful missionary asks is this: What elements of my faith have been more shaped by my culture than I realize? For the contemporary, evangelical Christian in Western society, the question is thus: What elements of evangelical Christianity have been informed and shaped more by the paradigms of modern
Enlightenment philosophy and scientific rationale than purely by God’s Word
(if it’s even possible to be purely biblical)? As you can see, I’ve already cheated by trying to tack on another question at the end of the question.
Newbigin gives his testimony this way:
“As a young missionary, I was confident that the critical evaluations I made about Hindu beliefs and practices were securely founded on God’s revelation in Christ. As I grew older, I learned to see that they were shaped more than I had realized by my own culture.” (p. 21)
In light of the ubiquitous discussion on
postmodernism in evangelical circles, it’s probably necessary for me to explain right away that what Newbigin does
NOT do is make an attempt at dismantling a proper confidence in the truth
(or “authority,” or “inerrancy,” depending on the label one prefers) of Scripture. If anything, his explanation thus far
(currently I’m in chapter 5) gives confidence in the authority of God through our sacred texts, particularly in the context of “a community that is committed to faith and obedience and is embodying that commitment in an active discipleship that embraces the whole of life, public and private.”
In the third chapter, he explains 5 strategies that have historically been used “to affirm the gospel in the context of post-Enlightenment culture.” In so doing, he rather effectively disassembles the liberal theological systems of such men as
Bultmann and
Schleiermacher, explaining quite clearly that their theologies were a product of the flawed presuppositions and framework of the modern scientific world-view.
(Of course, it’s worth mentioning that he also does this with Benjamin Warfield’s theological thinking.)The scary thing is that there seems to be a confidence in the evangelical church that we can shed any outside cultural baggage and actually view the Gospel from a purely objective perspective. This very confidence is only made possible by a presupposed, almost subconscious acceptance of the philosophy of scientific reason handed down to us by the fathers of the Enlightenment. Before one has even attempted to understand or explain the Gospel, there has already been a buy-in of that general philosophical framework
(though probably to a lesser degree for Christ-followers, with the help of the Holy Spirit.)Earlier in chapter two, Newbigin offers a question that seems to be most germane to the issues that he addresses.
“As people who are a part of modern Western culture, with its confidence in the validity of scientific methods, how can we move from the place where we explain the gospel in terms of our modern scientific world-view to the place where we explain our modern scientific world-view from the point of view of the gospel?”
Not only was that a necessary question in
1986, but it is an increasingly critical question in our emerging cultural context.
Just a few thoughts and ideas being stirred in me thus far. Still trying to wrap my brain around much of it. I’m thinking that there are huge evaluative implications on
Christendom in light of these things as well. Could it be that the basic tenets of Christendom have been an attempt to contextualize the gospel in response to the Enlightenment project? Comments, feedback, and questions are welcome.
Categories: mission, culture, church, Christendom